This is another favorite of mine, I love the dual concept, the way that there is a painting of a riotous, industrial, smog filled, city on the upper part of the wall, and then a little wink-wink allusion that this is in fact a wall through the traditional style posters painted on the bottom half of the mural (reproductions of which litter the more touristy areas of Paris, particularly Montmartre). As you might have guessed from the name of the neighbourhood, Garnier had a somewhat utopist sensibility (although the term utopia loses some of its bite in such a determinedly unpragmatic society, if all policy comes from theory you may as well have a hopeful theory). His original plan envisioned a massive neighbourhood of residential buildings, schools and community centers, and industry. Many of the murals in the neighbourhood are actually just paintings of his architectural drawings:
industrial plant, complete with smoke stacks and tubing. Such worshipful industrialism has tended to be the exclusive province of the ‘Anglo-Saxon’ world and angry Russian émigrés, I doubt that Ayn Rand sells much in France, but I imagine that at the turn of the century industry was still seen as an opportunity for huge progress, both technologically and socially. The high level of planning is however completely within character. I’ve been reading Paris to the Moon lately, a book in which Adam Gopnik, a writer for the New Yorker tries to dissect the joys, frustrations, commonalities, and essential differences between the U.S. and France (although New York and Paris are not exactly typical of their countries). At one point in discussing the theoretical approach he says, quite accurately I think, that it’s not quite that they can’t see the individual trees because they are only looking at the forest, but rather that they can’t see the forest because it’s covered by the map. Well in Lyon they’ve actually managed to create a physical manifestation of theory worship by covering a neighbourhood in murals of architectural plans. The irony is that if the plan had been successful, if the neighbourhood had flourished, they wouldn’t have needed to revitalize it with murals.
If this neighbourhood had been in North America the revitalization plan would have involved opening more stores, installing brighter lights, organizing an ethnic street festival and hoping that a Starbucks might set up and then the whole place could gentrify. The French approach was to invite various artists from around the world to create a mural of their vision of the ideal city. The mural on the left represents the ideal Egyptian city, and is a combination of pharaonic symbolism and silver lines meant to evoke microchips. The mural to the right is a vision of the ideal Indian city, and although it is supposed to represent three essences of life (something like culture, tradition, and religion) the little stick figures look for all the world to me like archaic video game characters that I need to jump over or shoot with my laser gun. The final fresque represents the ideal Russian city. The colourful chaos of this mural was a deliberate reaction by the artist against soviet style planned building, which was uniform, concrete, and grey. The mural actually reminds me of parts of Lyon: jumbles of pastel coloured houses piled up around each other like the end of a game Jenga, and the blue river snaking through the city, small enough to be part of daily life. But it is emphatically not like the Quartier États-Unis. Unlike the neighbourhood, the murals succeed because they are unique, colourful, and joyful.
Just outside of this area, off of a major road, three murals look down on a 5 way intersection cluttered with cars, construction materials, a tramway line, and telephone wire; they form an entry gate of sorts to the Quartier États-Unis. The murals are spectacular and odd: a futuristic glass and metal triangular apartment building, a reproduction of a 16th century Dutch masterpiece, and what seems to be a joyful cartoon version of the Dutch masterpiece. The masterpiece’s subject, the tower of Babel, seems dissonant with the celebration of Garnier the urbanist’s utopian vision. Is the mural an intended dig at the neighbourhood, a stridently humanist celebration of man’s potential? I have no idea. Regardless, this cautionary tale about ideal cities and man’s efforts at grand projects is a perfect front door decoration to the ‘United States Quarter’.
0 comments:
Post a Comment